- Fingers
- Posts
- There are almost no unionized bars. Here's why
There are almost no unionized bars. Here's why
Plus: If you buy this whiskey, you should be [redacted]!
đď¸ Now available at The Fingers Shop!
Score boozeletter merch and support independent journalism about drinking in America! Shop now.


Over the weekend, workers at New York Cityâs Attaboy went public with a union drive. This is a big deal in part because the cocktail bar itself is a big deal: it is often recognized among the worldâs best, and it traces a lineage to the late Sasha Petraske, whose legendary and influential Milk & Honey previously occupied the same storefront on Manhattanâs Eldridge Street from 1999-2013.
But Attaboy Local 134âthe workersâ independent union, named for the barâs street addressâis also a big deal because there simply arenât very many unionized bars. Not in relatively pro-labor cities like NYC, Chicago, or San Francisco, and certainly not anywhere else. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, of the 8.8 million workers in the United Statesâ âFood services and drinking placesâ sector in 2025, just 1.8% had union representation. With the exception of bars attached to hotels/casinos/stadiums/etc., which are sometimes organized as part of broader organizing drives in those businesses, the union bar is a very rare bird.
After half a century of anti-labor legislation, corporate consolidation, media capture, and so forth, itâs not easy to organize any American workplace in 2026. Hospitality operators have the full arsenal of well-honed union-busting tools at their disposal, up to and including summarily shutting down the business where workers are unionizing, like the owner of Brooklynâs Achilles Heel did in February. But bars and other standalone hospitality businesses like restaurants, coffee shops, and craft breweries also present unique structural and cultural challenges to workers that want to exercise their federally guaranteed right to organize with their coworkers for better pay, working conditions, and a voice on the job.
The physical layout of the industry, with tens of thousands of relatively small shops scattered across the country, is difficult and costly for organizers, who tend to favor bigger facilities with more workers. Hospitals, factories, etc. offer a much better âbang-for-buckâ to a union with limited resources (which is virtually all of them.) The wildly successful national organizing drive at Starbucks locations nationwideâ680 and countingâis the exception that proves the rule here. Though Starbucks Workers United is represented by Workers United, the baristasâ big innovation has been worker-to-worker organizingâi.e., ground-up instead of top-down.
âThatâs just not what's been the culture of our US labor movementâ for the past 40 or 50 years, Jonah Furman, a former writer and organizer at Labor Notes who now works for the United Auto Workers, told Fingers in 2022, calling it a ânew headspace.â But Starbucks stores are all more or less the same across the country, and its baristas all work for the same boss. (The fact that he made 6,666 times their median salary last year probably helps.) By contrast, the sheer variation from one independent F&B business to the next makes it much more difficult for would-be unionists to organize at scale, and without it, SBWUâs headline-generating, movement-sustaining momentum is extremely hard to come by.
The size of bars can also hobble drives in other ways. As Ben Anderson, Ph.D, a labor researcher, told Fingers in 2022, workers in these businesses often internalize the idea that theyâre just too small to be worthy of a union. He recalled a conversation with a craft brewery worker: âI asked him specifically, âWould you join a union?â And he said, âYeah, absolutely, I would join a union in a heartbeat,ââ recalled Anderson. âBut when I asked, âWould you organize a union here?â He said, âWell, no, because we're a really small shop, and I just don't think it'd be viable here.ââ
Employee turnover, a potential threat to any drive, can be a particular drag in restaurants and bars, where workers have been conditioned to believe that their jobs arenât careers and thus arenât worth fighting to improve. Better to just move on than make trouble. Turnover was âa huge reason the energy left,â Matt Marciniec, a former barista at the Twin Citiesâ Spyhouse Coffee Roasters, told Fingers after a failed drive in 2020. As the drive turned acrimonious, workers quit, thinning the ranks of the committed: âThey were all supportive of the union but also just werenât ready to fight it out as long as possible, so they were like, We gotta get out of here, this is not a place for us.â
The relative lack of hierarchy within the hospitality business has also stymied drives. At Death & Co, another high-profile Manhattan cocktail bar where a promising organizing effort collapsed in early 2024, bosses were able to persuade some workers that they were sympathetic to the unionâs demandsâor even deserving of sympathy themselves.
âI think we as employees don't always put ourselves in the employersâ or higher-upsâ place,â a Death & Co server, Ari Mayaudon, told Fingers following an election that saw the union lose 10-8 after every single worker had signed cards just months prior. (Mayaudon confirmed sheâd signed a union card but declined to say how sheâd voted in the election.) Anderson referred to this as the ââwe are a familyâ myth.â In a close-knit, rarified environment like a high-end bar, where management often looks, talks, and used to be part of the workforce, it can be difficult to convince even nominally pro-union workers to cast a vote that feels like itâs âagainstâ a boss they work with shoulder-to-shoulder.
Pro-union staffers at Attaboy are attuned to these distinctive obstacles. âA victory at Attaboy would send a message to bar and restaurant workers that unionization is a real possibility,â they wrote in a press release debuting Attaboy Local 134 to the world. (Attaboy itself did not respond to a request for comment.) The reverse is also true. A failed drive at Attaboy could underscore the received wisdom that standalone bars are an unnatural fit for unions, and that workers at these elite businesses do not need or want the benefits of collective bargaining. Clearly, some do, and will likely continue to, regardless of the outcome on Eldridge Street. But the stakes are high. One way or another, Attaboy Local 134 is a big deal.

đ¤ Consider a paid subscription to Fingers
This edition of the boozeletter is free for all to read, but most arenât. Youâre still on the free list, but now is a great time to change that:
Youâll get all of Fingersâ award-winning coverage about drinking in America straight to your inbox, plus access to the archives. This publication is 100% reader-supported, and I canât do it without you. Hope to see you on the other side of the paywall!âDave.

đŹ Good post alert
If you see a good post that the Fingers Fam should know about, please send me that good post via email, or a DM on Bluesky or Instagram.

đ¤ [Redactables]: Buffalo Trace Daniel Weller Spelt Wheat
Welcome to Fingers [Redactables], a running list of high-end wine and spirits that are so obscenely expensive that anybody who purchases them should be immediately⌠well⌠[redacted]. Taxed into the dirt? Pelted with tomatoes? A third thing that I probably shouldnât write on the internet? You decide!

Buffalo Trace Distillery
Wealth inequality is soaring under the second Trump administration, and you know what that means: revolution! Right? No? Weâre not doing that yet? Alright, well, in the meantime, it does mean that stupid status bottles are once again rolling forth from Kentuckyâs best distilleries marketing departments to score a slice of that K-shaped economic recovery. Earlier this month, The Sazerac Companyâs Buffalo Trace Distillery announced the release of Daniel Weller Spelt Wheat, a new bourbon made withâyou guessed itâspelt wheat. Per the release (emphasis mine):
The distillation team at Buffalo Trace was drawn to spelt not only for its flavor potential, but for its historical significance as one of the earliest cultivated wheat varieties, reflecting the Distilleryâs commitment to honoring tradition while embracing change through purposeful experimentation.
It rules that the press release for any [Redactables] winner could also be featured in Buzzwords of The Week. Maybe a lesson there. The suggested retail price is $549.99 for a 750 milliliter bottle, proving yet again that a thresher separates wheat from chaff, and a Weller Wheated separates fools from money.
đĽ Fingers [Redactability] Rating: 4.5 condo dads suddenly insisting theyâve always been into ancient European grains

đ§ Talking big booze deals and sad Cocktail Guys
Your fearless Fingers editor made some recent podcast appearances that may interest you. Catch me on:
The VinePair Podcast on April 2nd for a breakdown of my latest reporting on Reyes Beverage Groupâs now-consummated deal with Republic National Distributing Co. for 11 of the latterâs markets.
The Brewbound Podcast, also on April 2nd, for more discussion on the above deal, plus analysis on the Tilray Brands/BrewDog/lol situation and a bit on Molson Coorsâ acquisition of Monaco parent company Atomic Brands.
The Guys Podcast in early March to talk about the Cocktail Guy, an archetype of the modern male experience that will be painfully familiar to readers of this newsletter, with hosts with Bryan Quinby and Chris James. (Sorry Iâm posting this one so late, I thought I already had. My bad!)
Big thanks to the reporters/hosts/etc. who included me/Fingers in their work. If youâd like to get My Takeâ˘ď¸ on something, get in touch: [email protected]. Canât do every hit, but love doing the ones I can!

đ¤ Like reading Fingers, but in real life!
Did you know that I occasionally do speaking engagements? Itâs true! Iâll be delivering a keynote address later this week at the Minnesota Brewers Conference, and Iâm firming up my schedule for the rest of 2026.
Presentations are a fun mix of in-depth analysis, Q/As, and more. If youâd like to hire me to present my award-winning reporting on the beverage-alcohol industry to your teamâin person or remoteâget in touch at [email protected] to discuss further.
See Fingersâ ethics statement about speaking engagements here.


Donât miss out, follow Fingers on Instagram today. Itâs free and your feed will thank you. (Not really, that would be weird. But you know what I mean.)


Reply